Distribution of electric power · Maine

CMP - Fairfield Service Building

Fairfield, ME · ~43 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMP - Fairfield Service Building runs at 235% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

CMP - Fairfield Service Building: 2.8 TCR = 235% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMP - Fairfield Service Building safety composite

CMP - Fairfield Service Building scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2016→2024

CMP - Fairfield Service Building injury rate improved

CMP - Fairfield Service Building's TCR fell 4.2 from 4.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Fairfield, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.8 · 235% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/28
  • PHOTO Edgewater Generating…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edgewater Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

CMP - Fairfield Service Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMP - Fairfield Service Building averages 2.8 TCR (235% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMP - Fairfield Service Building TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=8 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where CMP - Fairfield Service Building falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 28 Distribution of electric power employers in Maine.

CMP - Fairfield Service Building (43 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CMP - Fairfield Service Building
CMP - Fairfield Service Building (43 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

CMP - Fairfield Service Building has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2022 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.8 2.4 2 0 0
2019 8.0 0.0 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.7 2.4 1 1 0
2016 4.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · ME · Fairfield

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 9 employers in Fairfield, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edgewater Generating Station 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Atkinson 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4585_10124 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Americus Operating - 1020 Southerfield Road Americus, GA 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dunbar & Brawn Construction 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE CARMEL ELECTRIC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maine Fire Protection Systems 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pyramid Plant 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Assistance Plus 320 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ranger Construction Corporation 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Klearview Manor 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR BDS Waste Disposal, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-TCR MOSL8 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Edgewater Generating Station 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Walls Inc-Raleigh 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vcf 028 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Modern Welding Company of Florida, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE HEADC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Eglin Air Force Base (1515) 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aeronaut Brewing Company - Somerville 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.