Distribution of electric power · Maine

CMP - Lewiston Service Building

Lewiston, ME · ~62 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMP - Lewiston Service Building runs at 468% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

CMP - Lewiston Service Building: 5.6 TCR = 468% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMP - Lewiston Service Building safety composite

CMP - Lewiston Service Building scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

CMP - Lewiston Service Building injury rate improved

CMP - Lewiston Service Building's TCR fell 1.8 from 4.3 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=13.1 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Lewiston, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.6 · 468% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #26/28
  • PHOTO Rapid City Branch Of…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rapid City Branch Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

CMP - Lewiston Service Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMP - Lewiston Service Building averages 5.6 TCR (468% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMP - Lewiston Service Building TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=13.1 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=5 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 1.2

Where CMP - Lewiston Service Building falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 28 Distribution of electric power employers in Maine.

CMP - Lewiston Service Building (62 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CMP - Lewiston Service Building
CMP - Lewiston Service Building (62 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

CMP - Lewiston Service Building has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2023 6.8 1.4 5 0 0
2022 4.2 1.4 3 0 0
2021 5.0 5.0 3 0 0
2020 7.7 0.0 5 0 0
2019 5.3 1.8 3 0 0
2018 13.1 6.5 7 1 0
2017 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2016 4.3 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · ME · Lewiston

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 99 employers in Lewiston, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rapid City Branch Office 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DAVIS SC (SHOPS) 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Macon Electric Cooperative 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BEC- Awendaw Facility 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Boundary Co. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carrol Materials 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kennebec Technologies Main Office 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Innovative Specialties, LLC 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Mary's Regional Medical Center 1,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Maine Medical Center 1,117 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7014 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7014 606 FTE
NAT-TCR St. Ann's Home, Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Key Resin Company Inc 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Monical's Pizza Champaign 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mco Orlando International Airport 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kurtz Bros. Warehouse 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cresline Plastic Pipe Company, Inc. 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Middleborough Gas & Electric Department Administration Office 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Middleborough Gas & Electric Department Electric Division 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.