Distribution of electric power · Maine

CMP - Portland Service Building

Portland, ME · ~128 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CMP - Portland Service Building runs at 354% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

CMP - Portland Service Building: 4.3 TCR = 354% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CMP - Portland Service Building safety composite

CMP - Portland Service Building scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2016→2024

CMP - Portland Service Building injury rate improved

CMP - Portland Service Building's TCR fell 3.1 from 5.1 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=15.7 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Portland, ME ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.3 · 354% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #20/28
  • PHOTO Eversource - Newtown
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eversource - Newtown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

CMP - Portland Service Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CMP - Portland Service Building averages 4.3 TCR (354% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CMP - Portland Service Building TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=15.7 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 1.2

Where CMP - Portland Service Building falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 28 Distribution of electric power employers in Maine.

CMP - Portland Service Building (128 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CMP - Portland Service Building
CMP - Portland Service Building (128 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

CMP - Portland Service Building has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.3 3 0 0
2023 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2022 15.7 10.5 6 0 0
2021 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2020 2.1 1.4 3 0 0
2019 3.2 0.8 4 0 0
2018 2.4 0.0 3 0 0
2017 4.8 1.6 6 0 0
2016 5.1 1.7 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · ME · Portland

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 244 employers in Portland, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eversource - Newtown 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Association of Missouri Electrical Cooperatives 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WESTSIDE OPERATIONS CENTER 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coos-Curry Electric Cooperative - Port Orford 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elanco Maine Winslow 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2209 LOWE S OF PRESQUE ISLE ME 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8226 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAI-0033-0033-04559 FAC-04559-LEWISTON-ME 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMC 8,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMC- 22 Bram 5,535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Portland 4,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMP Practices 2,063 FTE
NAT-TCR Owens & Minor Detroit 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Southeast Track 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Manor Park, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Owens & Minor Richmond 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE WA100 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction Resources Management, Inc. 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Convent Plant 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springlane 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.