Refrigerated warehousing · Tennessee

Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.

Arlington, TN · ~191 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Refrigerated warehousing workplace, earning a grade F.

Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.: 12.7 TCR = 218% of Refrigerated warehousing BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. safety composite

Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.6

2016→2019

Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. injury rate improved

Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.'s TCR fell 15.6 from 21.0 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 21.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=21.0 · 2017=18.9 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Arlington, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.7 · 218% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #18/18
  • PHOTO Dawn Foods Northeast
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 99 inj
  • SIZE ~191 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dawn Foods Northeast (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. averages 12.7 TCR (218% of the Refrigerated warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. TCR series: 2016=21 · 2017=18.9 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=5.4 · BLS 5.8

Where Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. falls in its industry

1,039 Refrigerated warehousing establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 18 Refrigerated warehousing employers in Tennessee.

Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. (191 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc.
Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. (191 employees, TCR 12.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Co 19 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. has more employees than the Refrigerated warehousing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.4 5.4 10 0 0
2018 5.4 5.4 10 0 0
2017 18.9 18.9 37 0 0
2016 21.0 21.0 42 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · TN · Arlington

1,039 Refrigerated warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 21 employers in Arlington, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dawn Foods Northeast 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edwardsville Fwd WH 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milwaukie OR 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Costa Fruit and Produce Company 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE FORD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copperweld Bimetallics LLC -Cotton Mill 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manchester Tank 191 FTE
STATE-SIZE Card-Monroe Corp. 191 FTE
CITY-NEAR MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stryker Wright - Arlington, TN 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR R+L Carriers - MEM 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR WOC 285 FTE
NAT-TCR Fire Department 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Homestead Gardens, Inc. - Davidsonville 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin Park Store 12.7 TCR
NAT-TCR IAC Acoustics a Division of Sound Seal 12.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Broadway Sacramento 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE McRae Footwear Hwy 109 N 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cass Construction, Inc. dba Cass Arrieta 191 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meyer Corporation 191 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.