Cable and Other Subscription Programming · Colorado

CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd

Colorado Springs, CO · ~104 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd runs at 660% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cable and Other Subscription Programming workplace, earning a grade F.

CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd: 4.6 TCR = 660% of Cable and Other Subscription Programming BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd safety composite

CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd: 3.0 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2023

CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd's TCR rose 3.3 from 3.0 in 2022 to 6.3 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · Colorado Springs, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.6 · 660% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #9/17
  • PHOTO CO - Federal Heights…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CO - Federal Heights, 8470 Umatilla St (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd averages 4.6 TCR (660% of the Cable and Other Subscription Programming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd TCR series: 2022=3 · 2023=6.3 · BLS 0.7

Where CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd falls in its industry

455 Cable and Other Subscription P establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 17 Cable and Other Subscription P employers in Colorado.

CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd (104 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd
CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd (104 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

CO - Colorado Springs, 213 N Union Blvd has fewer employees than the Cable and Other Subscription Programming median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.3 4.2 6 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · CO · Colorado Springs

455 Cable and Other Subscription Programming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CO - Federal Heights, 8470 Umatilla St 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Breezeline - Berwick 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PA - Reading, 400 Riverfront Dr 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR TN - Chattanooga, 2030 E Polymer Dr 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Boulder Service Center-205 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colorado Operations 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Junction 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henry Wurst Inc - West 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Fiesta # 08 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley Baptist, Brownsville 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #36 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Works 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shamrock Plumbing 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pangere 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arinc Incorporated (Bohemia NY) 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Architectural Metals 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.