Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing · Colorado

CO-Loveland

Loveland, CO · ~270 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CO-Loveland runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

CO-Loveland: 0.2 TCR = 7% of Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CO-Loveland safety composite

CO-Loveland scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CO-Loveland held a steady TCR band

CO-Loveland's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · Loveland, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO METRIX Instruments
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~270 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: METRIX Instruments (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

CO-Loveland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CO-Loveland averages 0.2 TCR (7% of the Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CO-Loveland TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CO-Loveland falls in its industry

125 Digital test equipment (e.g., establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Digital test equipment (e.g., employers in Colorado.

CO-Loveland (270 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CO-Loveland
CO-Loveland (270 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

CO-Loveland has more employees than the Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 1 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · CO · Loveland

125 Digital test equipment (e.g., electronic and electrical circuits and equipment testing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 188 employers in Loveland, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR METRIX Instruments 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR WA-Everett 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR HID Global 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA-Calabasas 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 071820-COLORADO SPRINGS P&DC 270 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOCATION 16001 270 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Ritz-Carlton, Bachelor Gulch 270 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Nugget Cripple Creek 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical Center of the Rockies 1,357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hach Company 1,291 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hach Loveland 1,281 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6019 937 FTE
NAT-TCR PCM Main Office 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CS Wholesale Grocers : Edison, NJ (GMD) 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Equistar Chemical, LP - A Lyondellbasell Company, Bayport 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Starcon @ BP Whiting 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Office/Seat/Strachota Sc 270 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shop Rite of Bruckner Blvd 270 FTE
NAT-SIZE L.D. McCauley 270 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Heating, Inc. 270 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.