wired telecommunication carriers · Colorado

CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041

Colorado Springs, CO · ~686 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041 runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical wired telecommunication carriers workplace, earning a grade B.

CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041: 0.4 TCR = 63% of wired telecommunication carriers BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041 safety composite

CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041 held a steady TCR band

CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.4 in 2022 to 0.5 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.4 · 2023=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · Colorado Springs, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.4 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #4/17
  • PHOTO TX_Austin_12012 N. M…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~686 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TX_Austin_12012 N. Mopac Expwy_0AAU1500 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041 averages 0.4 TCR (63% of the wired telecommunication carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041 TCR series: 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.5 · BLS 0.7

Where CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041 falls in its industry

455 wired telecommunication carrie establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 17 wired telecommunication carrie employers in Colorado.

CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041 (686 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041
CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041 (686 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

CO_Colorado Springs_2221 E Bijou_ADLA0041 has more employees than the wired telecommunication carriers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.5 0.1 3 0 0
2022 0.4 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · CO · Colorado Springs

455 wired telecommunication carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TX_Austin_12012 N. Mopac Expwy_0AAU1500 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA - Virtual - E+ 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX_Austin_2433 Rutland Dr._AUSRTL20 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR FL_Orlando_65 South Keller Road_00620110 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE ENWDCO46 - AT&T Services, Inc. 685 FTE
STATE-SIZE AdventHealth Castle Rock 684 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lipan Distribution Center-040 690 FTE
STATE-SIZE CO - Englewood, 183 Inverness Dr West 690 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Dept. of Labor & Workforce Development (6) 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fern Lodge 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NSU Corporation 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pritchard Industries, LLC. - DC 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE SMOC 686 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gilead Sciences, Inc. 686 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rudolph and Sletten 686 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZCHD 686 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.