Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant · California

Coachella Valley Water District

Coachella, CA · ~540 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coachella Valley Water District runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant workplace, earning a grade D.

Coachella Valley Water District: 3.8 TCR = 136% of Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coachella Valley Water District safety composite

Coachella Valley Water District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Coachella Valley Water District: 4.1 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2022

Coachella Valley Water District's TCR rose 0.4 from 4.1 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Coachella, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 136% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #122/201
  • PHOTO Hoerr Construction, …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 81 inj
  • SIZE ~540 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hoerr Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Coachella Valley Water District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coachella Valley Water District averages 3.8 TCR (136% of the Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coachella Valley Water District TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=4.1 · 2022=4.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Coachella Valley Water District falls in its industry

1,614 Construction management, water establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #122 safest of 201 Construction management, water employers in California.

Coachella Valley Water District (540 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Coachella Valley Water District
Coachella Valley Water District (540 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Coachella Valley Water District has more employees than the Construction management, water and sewag median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.5 4.1 20 2 0
2019 4.1 3.5 26 0 0
2018 2.6 2.5 12 2 0
2017 4.1 3.4 23 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · Coachella

1,614 Construction management, water and sewage treatment plant employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 36 employers in Coachella, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hoerr Construction, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Young Construction Company, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR VacVision Environmental, LLC 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marinship Development Interests, Inc. 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE SoMoCo Labor Supply Inc. 540 FTE
STATE-SIZE kdc/ one 540 FTE
STATE-SIZE Granada Hills Charter 540 FTE
STATE-SIZE QuantumScape Battery, Inc. SJ1 539 FTE
CITY-NEAR TGH Inc 758 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spotlight 29 Casino 479 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coachella 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR COACHELLA OFFICE 325 FTE
NAT-TCR Google Catering* 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Secured Document Shredding, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Flower City Packaging 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Manheim New England 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sacred Heart Medical Center 540 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenberry Industrial, LLC 540 FTE
NAT-SIZE S09805 - Phoenix Call Center 540 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCO - Flight Ops 540 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.