Distribution line, sewer and water, construction · Arkansas

Coakley Company, Inc.

Hot Springs, AR · ~30 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coakley Company, Inc. runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution line, sewer and water, construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Coakley Company, Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 84% of Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coakley Company, Inc. safety composite

Coakley Company, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Coakley Company, Inc.: 0.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Coakley Company, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.5 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Hot Springs, AR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/8
  • PHOTO East TN
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: East TN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Coakley Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coakley Company, Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (84% of the Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coakley Company, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Coakley Company, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and w establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 8 Distribution line, sewer and w employers in Arkansas.

Coakley Company, Inc. (30 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Coakley Company, Inc.
Coakley Company, Inc. (30 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Coakley Company, Inc. has fewer employees than the Distribution line, sewer and water, cons median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2022 7.2 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · AR · Hot Springs

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and water, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 112 employers in Hot Springs, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR East TN 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR George J. Igel & Co., Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JOHN NERI CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Partridge Well Drilling Company, Inc. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Entergy Harrison 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jonesboro Warehouse AK8N 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - El Dorado Chemical-El Dorado 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patriot Underground Solutions Specialist LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR 03080001-030802 CHI ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST VINCENT HOSPITAL HOT SPRINGS 1,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-03080001-030802 1,198 FTE
CITY-NEAR NATIONAL PARK MEDICAL CENTER 690 FTE
NAT-TCR Dutch American Foods, Inc. Beecher 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Gulfstream Aerospace 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Smithfield Foods Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith Feed Service, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE ECD Services, Inc. - Bldg 2 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penn Pallet Woodland 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACS - Portland 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Searcy Construction Services, Inc. 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.