Timbers, made from logs or bolts · Alabama

Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations

Chapman, AL · ~74 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Timbers, made from logs or bolts workplace, earning a grade C.

Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations: 3.5 TCR = 107% of Timbers, made from logs or bolts BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations safety composite

Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2019

Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations injury rate improved

Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations's TCR fell 1.6 from 2.5 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=9.7 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321113 · Chapman, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 107% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #34/56
  • PHOTO Dillard Lumber
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dillard Lumber (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations averages 3.5 TCR (107% of the Timbers, made from logs or bolts BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=9.7 · 2018=1 · 2019=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations falls in its industry

905 Timbers, made from logs or bol establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 56 Timbers, made from logs or bol employers in Alabama.

Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations (74 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations
Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations (74 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Coastal Forest Products - Lumber Operations has more employees than the Timbers, made from logs or bolts median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2018 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 9.7 8.5 8 0 0
2016 2.5 2.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321113 · AL · Chapman

905 Timbers, made from logs or bolts employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 4 employers in Chapman, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dillard Lumber 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Fraser Lumber Mill 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CARL ROSENBERRY & SONS LUMBER, INC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tillamook Lumber Company 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greene County Steam Plant 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greene County Steam Plant - APC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coosa Valley Electric 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rives Construction Company, Inc. 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coastal Forest Products - Plywood Operations 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chapman Lumber - WP 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chapman Plywood - WP 139 FTE
NAT-TCR Fort Gaines Health Care 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR WNA-Bremen 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Medical Fitness Center 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR APS Streetsboro Plant 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Service Works Commercial Roofing, Inc. 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aptar Torrington 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE White Mountain Mental Health 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Common Ground 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.