Soft drinks merchant wholesalers · Arkansas

Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP

Fort Smith, AR · ~96 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP runs at 177% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Soft drinks merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP: 3.9 TCR = 177% of Soft drinks merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP safety composite

Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP: 2.1 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.46× in 2018

Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP's TCR rose 3.6 from 2.1 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424490 · Fort Smith, AR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 177% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #7/17
  • PHOTO CA - Castroville - 1…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CA - Castroville - 11205 Commercial Pkwy - The American Bottling Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arkansas employers → · Look up another →

Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP averages 3.9 TCR (177% of the Soft drinks merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=5.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP falls in its industry

1,278 Soft drinks merchant wholesale establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arkansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 17 Soft drinks merchant wholesale employers in Arkansas.

Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP (96 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 6.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP
Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP (96 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 6.0

Coca Cola Bottling Company of Fort Smith, LLLP has more employees than the Soft drinks merchant wholesalers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.7 5.7 5 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424490 · AR · Fort Smith

1,278 Soft drinks merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,393 rated employers in Arkansas with headcount on file · 249 employers in Fort Smith, AR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CA - Castroville - 11205 Commercial Pkwy - The American Bottling Company 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mineola, TX 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Green Bay Seven Up Bottling Company, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR C046 Terre Haute 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Craighead Electric Cooperative Corporation Jonesboro 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klein Tools Fort Smith 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shippers Products 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hackney Ladish INC 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH 1,944 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABB Motors and Mechanical, Inc. - Fort Smith 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Smith - 5713 RS Boreham Jr Street 985 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Medical Center - Fort Smith 970 FTE
NAT-TCR Heritage Health - Mt. Zion 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryerson - Houston South 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR General Shale Columbus Brick 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Carteret (Njcrt) 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holland - TM 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iron Hill Brewery- Wilmington 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gadsden Center (Algad) 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boulder (Cobou) 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.