New car dealers · Pennsylvania

Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills

Pittsburgh, PA · ~51 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills runs at 208% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical New car dealers workplace, earning a grade F.

Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills: 7.1 TCR = 208% of New car dealers BLS 3.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills safety composite

Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2019→2020

Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills injury rate improved

Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills's TCR fell 5.7 from 9.9 in 2019 to 4.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=9.9 · 2020=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 208% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #148/168
  • PHOTO Landmark Ford Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Landmark Ford Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills averages 7.1 TCR (208% of the New car dealers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills TCR series: 2019=9.9 · 2020=4.2 · BLS 3.4

Where Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills falls in its industry

2,847 New car dealers establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #148 safest of 168 New car dealers employers in Pennsylvania.

Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills (51 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills
Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills (51 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Cochran South Hills, Inc., dba Nissan of South Hills has fewer employees than the New car dealers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.2 0.0 2 0 0
2019 9.9 2.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · PA · Pittsburgh

2,847 New car dealers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Landmark Ford Inc 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR OB Portland 5 Inc 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Capitol Automotive Inc 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schomp Automotive 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Regulated Fossil Support 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE EUD Empire 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mechanicsburg 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allentown Office 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Lci - 028 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Interim Healthcare of Tulsa 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Production Paint Finishers 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Swanson Wiper Corporation 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE FDR Services Corp of VA 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE All Metals Supply Inc 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hydro Construction Company, Inc. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Landsberg Chicago 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.