Couriers and Express Delivery Services · Colorado

Cocol - Colorado Springs

Colorado Springs, CO · ~339 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cocol - Colorado Springs runs at 211% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Couriers and Express Delivery Services workplace, earning a grade F.

Cocol - Colorado Springs: 13.7 TCR = 211% of Couriers and Express Delivery Services BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cocol - Colorado Springs safety composite

Cocol - Colorado Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 43% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
D 7.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cocol - Colorado Springs held a steady TCR band

Cocol - Colorado Springs's TCR held near 0.3 from 11.2 in 2019 to 10.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 20.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=11.2 · 2020=15.7 · 2022=20.9 · 2023=10.1 · 2024=10.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Colorado Springs, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.7 · 211% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #99/140
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 181 inj
  • SIZE ~339 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - DLI5 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Cocol - Colorado Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cocol - Colorado Springs averages 13.7 TCR (211% of the Couriers and Express Delivery Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cocol - Colorado Springs TCR series: 2019=11.2 · 2020=15.7 · 2022=20.9 · 2023=10.1 · 2024=10.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Cocol - Colorado Springs falls in its industry

6,679 Couriers and Express Delivery establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #99 safest of 140 Couriers and Express Delivery employers in Colorado.

Cocol - Colorado Springs (339 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Cocol - Colorado Springs
Cocol - Colorado Springs (339 employees, TCR 13.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Cocol - Colorado Springs has more employees than the Couriers and Express Delivery Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.9 7.0 15 2 0
2023 10.1 8.9 16 1 0
2022 20.9 15.8 64 2 0
2020 15.7 10.3 55 4 1
2019 11.2 8.2 31 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CO · Colorado Springs

6,679 Couriers and Express Delivery Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DLI5 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR JST Logistics Manchester 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 490020000 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SYRACUSE (NYSYR) 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ensign Well Services - Rockies 339 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pueblo Chemical Plant 338 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raytheon_Buckley_CO 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3867 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 130 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eau Claire West Wi - 3011 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Transport - 193 13.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 181 Fort Lauderdale 13.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE CA-General Office #4 - SCE 10 339 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foothill Fire Protection, Inc 339 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tietex International Ltd 339 FTE
NAT-SIZE SRG Global, INC 339 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.