Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing · California

Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc.

Live Oak, CA · ~131 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc. runs at 242% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc.: 8.0 TCR = 242% of Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc. safety composite

Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2017→2024

Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc. injury rate improved

Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.3 from 7.3 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.3 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=14.8 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · Live Oak, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 242% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #26/45
  • PHOTO VERSA CORPORATION
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~131 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VERSA CORPORATION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc. averages 8.0 TCR (242% of the Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc. TCR series: 2017=7.3 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=14.8 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc. falls in its industry

433 Harvesting machinery and equip establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 45 Harvesting machinery and equip employers in California.

Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc. (131 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc.
Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc. (131 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Coe Orchard Equipment, Inc. has more employees than the Harvesting machinery and equipment, agri median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2023 9.4 9.4 11 0 0
2022 8.6 5.1 10 0 0
2021 14.8 8.1 18 2 0
2020 7.7 3.1 10 0 0
2019 9.8 4.9 18 0 0
2018 5.5 4.9 10 0 0
2017 7.3 4.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · CA · Live Oak

433 Harvesting machinery and equipment, agriculture, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 7 employers in Live Oak, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VERSA CORPORATION 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Triple C Manufacturing, Inc. 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR McFarlane Manufacturing 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JAIN Irrigation-Watertown 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Babe Blosser Ranch 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dave Wilson Nursery 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gold Flora Corp 131 FTE
STATE-SIZE Land FLC 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smith Ranch 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Oak Plant 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR All-American Construction, Inc. 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lomo Cold Storage 22 FTE
NAT-TCR Carthage Plant 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Fort Smith 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Piedmont Walton Hospital 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Day Program 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Professional Aviation Marketing, Inc. 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE TSS at AdvanSix Hopewell VA 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silocaf USA 131 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - San Antonio 131 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.