Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Washington

Cogir of Queen Anne

Seattle, WA · ~119 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cogir of Queen Anne runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cogir of Queen Anne: 9.6 TCR = 253% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cogir of Queen Anne safety composite

Cogir of Queen Anne scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cogir of Queen Anne: 4.8 → 14.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2024

Cogir of Queen Anne's TCR rose 9.7 from 4.8 in 2023 to 14.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.6 · 253% of ind

  • DART 9.7 DART
  • RANK #63/109
  • PHOTO Sequoias San Francisco
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sequoias San Francisco (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Cogir of Queen Anne in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cogir of Queen Anne averages 9.6 TCR (253% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cogir of Queen Anne TCR series: 2023=4.8 · 2024=14.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Cogir of Queen Anne falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Cogir of Queen Anne (119 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cogir of Queen Anne
Cogir of Queen Anne (119 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Cogir of Queen Anne has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.5 9.7 8 1 0
2023 4.8 3.2 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WA · Seattle

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sequoias San Francisco 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR TRAIL CREEK PLACE M C 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-512205 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huron Woods 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE JRD Texas, LLC 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway Services LLC - BP Cherry Pt. Refinery 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE EAGLE BEVERAGE AND ACCESORIES 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metrie Manufacturing - Ferndale 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR Town and Country Resort 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Iaosk - Oskaloosa 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Flbra - Bradenton Center 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mihow - Howell 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE BGB Pet Supply 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE George P Johnson Austin 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continuing Healthcare Adams Lane LLC 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyatt Regency Coral Gables 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.