Skilled nursing facilities · New York

Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation

Woodbury, NY · ~789 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation: 9.9 TCR = 153% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation safety composite

Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation: 9.6 → 10.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 10.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.92× in 2017

Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation's TCR rose 0.7 from 9.6 in 2016 to 10.3 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.92× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Woodbury, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.9 · 153% of ind

  • DART 9.1 DART
  • RANK #466/616
  • PHOTO CareCore at Lima
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 115 inj
  • SIZE ~789 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CareCore at Lima (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation averages 9.9 TCR (153% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=9.6 · 2017=10.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #466 safest of 616 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New York.

Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation (789 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation
Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation (789 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Cold Spring Hills Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 10.3 9.1 60 0 0
2016 9.6 8.9 55 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Woodbury

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 32 employers in Woodbury, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CareCore at Lima 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR McFarlan Home 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SLC - Transitional Care 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monsignor Bojnowski Manor 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Teachers Federal Credit Union 786 FTE
STATE-SIZE Management Office 792 FTE
STATE-SIZE 972 Brush Hollow Rd 786 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1301 6TH AVE 794 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cold Spring Hills 718 FTE
CITY-NEAR Theradynamics Rehab Management LLC 596 FTE
CITY-NEAR Healthpro Staffing 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR White Oaks Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 280 FTE
NAT-TCR 0681 - Bakersfield South, Ca 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 0019 - Santa Rosa, Ca 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR B-X Mansfield LLC 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Double L Cattle Company 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 430-DC001 789 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ottumwa Works 789 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC-035 789 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0908 - Cwi Optical Lab - Ca 789 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.