Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system · Hawaii

Collections Systems Maintenance Division

Aiea, HI · ~174 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Collections Systems Maintenance Division runs at 663% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

Collections Systems Maintenance Division: 8.0 TCR = 663% of Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Collections Systems Maintenance Division safety composite

Collections Systems Maintenance Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Collections Systems Maintenance Division: 6.3 → 7.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 10.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2019

Collections Systems Maintenance Division's TCR rose 0.8 from 6.3 in 2017 to 7.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Aiea, HI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 663% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO Forsyth
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~174 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Forsyth (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Hawaii employers → · Look up another →

Collections Systems Maintenance Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Collections Systems Maintenance Division averages 8.0 TCR (663% of the Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Collections Systems Maintenance Division TCR series: 2017=6.3 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=7.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Collections Systems Maintenance Division falls in its industry

400 Waste collection, treatment, a establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Hawaii alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Waste collection, treatment, a employers in Hawaii.

Collections Systems Maintenance Division (174 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Collections Systems Maintenance Division
Collections Systems Maintenance Division (174 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Collections Systems Maintenance Division has more employees than the Waste collection, treatment, and disposa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 7.2 4.8 8 1 0
2018 10.4 9.6 11 3 0
2017 6.3 6.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · HI · Aiea

400 Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,022 rated employers in Hawaii with headcount on file · 53 employers in Aiea, HI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Forsyth 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bailard 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Utilities - Cholla WTP 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Macon Office 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PMRF US HI Kekaha HI HI993 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Azul Hawaii Resorts, Kauai - LLC (Koloa Landing Resort) 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE 100179 - Kamehameha Guideway 173 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6962-SWY-0025-0025-02944 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pearlridge 467 261 FTE
CITY-NEAR BEK, Inc. 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR HONOLULU HI 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Odom - Aiea 152 FTE
NAT-TCR Shop 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR La Cascada - Resort 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0020 3312 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 401 Goldstar Hwy 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Qure Medical - Sturtevant 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Retirement and Care Center 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Van Buren Charter Township 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : MFG-Rushville, IN-USA 174 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.