Insulators, electrical porcelain, manufacturing · Colorado

Colorado Operations - Grand Junction

Grand Junction, CO · ~160 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Colorado Operations - Grand Junction runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Insulators, electrical porcelain, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Colorado Operations - Grand Junction: 4.1 TCR = 124% of Insulators, electrical porcelain, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Colorado Operations - Grand Junction safety composite

Colorado Operations - Grand Junction scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2022

Colorado Operations - Grand Junction injury rate improved

Colorado Operations - Grand Junction's TCR fell 2.0 from 6.4 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.3 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327110 · Grand Junction, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 124% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #10/13
  • PHOTO Morrow Plant
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Morrow Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Colorado Operations - Grand Junction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Colorado Operations - Grand Junction averages 4.1 TCR (124% of the Insulators, electrical porcelain, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Colorado Operations - Grand Junction TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.3 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=4.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Colorado Operations - Grand Junction falls in its industry

109 Insulators, electrical porcela establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 13 Insulators, electrical porcela employers in Colorado.

Colorado Operations - Grand Junction (160 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Colorado Operations - Grand Junction
Colorado Operations - Grand Junction (160 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Colorado Operations - Grand Junction has more employees than the Insulators, electrical porcelain, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.3 3.9 10 0 0
2021 3.5 2.1 3 2 0
2019 2.3 0.8 1 2 0
2018 2.1 1.6 3 1 0
2017 6.1 2.4 8 2 0
2016 6.4 2.1 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327110 · CO · Grand Junction

109 Insulators, electrical porcelain, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 233 employers in Grand Junction, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Morrow Plant 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kohler Wisconsin Vitreous 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Federal-Mogul Powertrain Cambrige Ohio 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CoorsTek Vista, Inc. 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Olson's Greenhouses of Colorado, LLC 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE WYCO Field Services 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concrete Construction 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE McClure Concrete, Inc. 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital 2,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital and Medical Center 2,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Hospital 1,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hilltop Health Services Corporation- 609 27 1/2 Road 641 FTE
NAT-TCR ISD 742 Clearview Elementary 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 4598-Rtc Texarkana 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR West Palm Beach 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Santee 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Long Beach Memorial Med Ctr 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hawaii Kai 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Multi Customer - Alliance (MRU2655) 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE GE Lighting E&M. (SMRU0876) 160 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.