Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking · Colorado

Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS

Colorado Springs, CO · ~74 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking workplace, earning a grade C.

Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS: 4.6 TCR = 102% of Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS safety composite

Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2016→2024

Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS injury rate improved

Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS's TCR fell 7.3 from 10.1 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.1 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Colorado Springs, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.6 · 102% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #9/32
  • PHOTO Fremont IN FXFE-FRE
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fremont IN FXFE-FRE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS averages 4.6 TCR (102% of the Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS TCR series: 2016=10.1 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS falls in its industry

3,020 Less Than Truckload General Fr establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 32 Less Than Truckload General Fr employers in Colorado.

Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS (74 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS
Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS (74 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Colorado Springs CO FXFE-COS has more employees than the Less Than Truckload General Freight Truc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2023 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2022 4.7 2.3 4 0 0
2020 3.7 2.5 3 0 0
2019 3.5 3.5 3 0 0
2016 10.1 10.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · CO · Colorado Springs

3,020 Less Than Truckload General Freight Trucking employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fremont IN FXFE-FRE 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lufkin TX FXFE-LFK 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Memphis TN FXFE-MEM 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Diego CA FXFE-SDO 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Natural Soda LLC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherokee Station-105 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pawnee Station-888 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corden Pharma Boulder 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Fremont IN FXFE-FRE 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lufkin TX FXFE-LFK 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Memphis TN FXFE-MEM 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR San Diego CA FXFE-SDO 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Houston Metals 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Susquehanna Auto, Inc. 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Landings of Oregon 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Santa Monica Seafood (Santa Monica Market) 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.