For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential · South Carolina

Columbia Division

Columbia, SC · ~35 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Columbia Division runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential workplace, earning a grade B.

Columbia Division: 2.4 TCR = 63% of For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Columbia Division safety composite

Columbia Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Columbia Division held a steady TCR band

Columbia Division's TCR held near 0.1 from 5.5 in 2018 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Columbia, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 63% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO SCM Construction Mgm…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCM Construction Mgmt Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Columbia Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Columbia Division averages 2.4 TCR (63% of the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Columbia Division TCR series: 2018=5.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Columbia Division falls in its industry

341 For-sale builders (i.e., build establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 For-sale builders (i.e., build employers in South Carolina.

Columbia Division (35 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Columbia Division
Columbia Division (35 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Columbia Division has fewer employees than the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.5 5.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · SC · Columbia

341 For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCM Construction Mgmt Services 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charleston Division 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri Pointe Homes Arizona 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dayton 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Conway Service Center and Warehouse 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE FLORENCE DISTRICT OFFICE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Delivery Operations (Charleston) 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darlington County Water & Sewer Authority 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR ESCO Construction Co 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Noland co 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Putnam Plastics Corporation 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Valley Ag Transport 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stoops Freightliner TC - Lafayette 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stalwork Inc Office 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE McKee Mechanical Inc. dba McKee Ward Mechanical Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Napa Valley PSI, Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.