Street cleaning service · South Carolina

Columbia

Columbia, SC · ~75 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Columbia runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Street cleaning service workplace, earning a grade D.

Columbia: 3.1 TCR = 142% of Street cleaning service BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Columbia safety composite

Columbia scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2024

Columbia injury rate improved

Columbia's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424490 · Columbia, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.1 · 142% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/24
  • PHOTO LCCB 1L05 MARMORA DI…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LCCB 1L05 MARMORA DISTRIBUTION CTR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Columbia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Columbia averages 3.1 TCR (142% of the Street cleaning service BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Columbia TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Columbia falls in its industry

1,278 Street cleaning service establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 24 Street cleaning service employers in South Carolina.

Columbia (75 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 6.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Columbia
Columbia (75 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 6.0

Columbia has more employees than the Street cleaning service median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 18 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.5 2.2 4 0 0
2021 7.4 5.0 6 0 0
2020 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2019 6.5 6.5 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.5 1.8 4 0 0
2016 2.2 2.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424490 · SC · Columbia

1,278 Street cleaning service employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LCCB 1L05 MARMORA DISTRIBUTION CTR 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gallup COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR C232 Beckley 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR WV - Fairmont - 235 Business Park - The American Bottling Company 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Creative Builders, Inc. 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hill Electric Company 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan-Kel Concrete Cutting 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enviva Pellets Greenwood, LLC ( Formerly, Colombo Energy Inc.) 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR Cohen Miamisburg-Metal Shredders 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lowes Foods #205 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Nursing Agency Community Services 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Advanced Window Corp. 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Distributed Workforce : Carolina, Puerto Rico - Haier Appliances Caribbean and Company 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Immanuel Village 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ludlow Composites Corp 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.