Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing · Mississippi

Columbus Brick Company

Columbus, MS · ~93 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Columbus Brick Company runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Columbus Brick Company: 5.6 TCR = 171% of Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Columbus Brick Company safety composite

Columbus Brick Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Columbus Brick Company: 2.3 → 6.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.04× in 2024

Columbus Brick Company's TCR rose 4.5 from 2.3 in 2019 to 6.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327120 · Columbus, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 171% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO HarbisonWalker Inter…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HarbisonWalker International Sproul Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Columbus Brick Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Columbus Brick Company averages 5.6 TCR (171% of the Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Columbus Brick Company TCR series: 2019=2.3 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=4 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=6.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Columbus Brick Company falls in its industry

307 Bricks (i.e., common, face, gl establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Bricks (i.e., common, face, gl employers in Mississippi.

Columbus Brick Company (93 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Columbus Brick Company
Columbus Brick Company (93 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Columbus Brick Company has more employees than the Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, holl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.8 5.8 7 0 0
2023 8.5 5.7 9 0 0
2022 4.0 3.0 4 0 0
2021 6.5 5.4 6 0 0
2020 5.6 5.6 4 1 0
2019 2.3 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327120 · MS · Columbus

307 Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 104 employers in Columbus, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HarbisonWalker International Sproul Plant 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fireclay Tile Aromas 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HC Muddox 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Refractory Sales & Service Co., Inc. 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northcentral Electric Power Association 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE MS (Southern Regional Office) 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pride Mobility Products Pontotoc 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mitchell Beverage 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Columbus 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - FR Columbus 753 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paccar Engine Company 627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bracken Construction Company, Inc. 376 FTE
NAT-TCR McKenzie Health System 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MIA 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Boston 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SSA Gulf - Panama City 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glen Ridge Health Campus 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stockmen's Hotel and Casino LLC 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Shale Spring City 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE FoodTown #209 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.