Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing · Alabama

Columbus Brick Phenix City

Phenix City, AL · ~50 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Columbus Brick Phenix City runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Columbus Brick Phenix City: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Columbus Brick Phenix City safety composite

Columbus Brick Phenix City scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2021→2024

Columbus Brick Phenix City injury rate improved

Columbus Brick Phenix City's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=3.9 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327120 · Phenix City, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/17
  • PHOTO Birmingham Hot Metal…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Birmingham Hot Metal Coatings (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Columbus Brick Phenix City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Columbus Brick Phenix City averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Columbus Brick Phenix City TCR series: 2021=3.9 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Columbus Brick Phenix City falls in its industry

307 Bricks (i.e., common, face, gl establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 17 Bricks (i.e., common, face, gl employers in Alabama.

Columbus Brick Phenix City (50 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Columbus Brick Phenix City
Columbus Brick Phenix City (50 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 57 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Columbus Brick Phenix City has fewer employees than the Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, holl median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2022 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327120 · AL · Phenix City

307 Bricks (i.e., common, face, glazed, hollow, vitrified), clay, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 52 employers in Phenix City, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Birmingham Hot Metal Coatings 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sioux City Brick & Tile 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morgan Advanced Materials Certech Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint Gobain Advance Ceramics, LLC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 8600 Live Haul Koch Foods 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeast Cherokee Construction, Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Building LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alatrade - Phenix City 801 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alatrade Foods Inc - Phenix City 552 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1284 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1284 377 FTE
NAT-TCR Cummins Turbo Technologies 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson (Gas), MO 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Daily's Premium Meats 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Equipment Depot Texas, Inc. - Waco 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Triumph Plastics, LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE AC Aventura 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE 52-03 Center LLC 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vicks 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.