Retirement homes without nursing care · California

Columbus Estates

Bakersfield, CA · ~34 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Columbus Estates runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement homes without nursing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Columbus Estates: 4.9 TCR = 128% of Retirement homes without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Columbus Estates safety composite

Columbus Estates scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2017→2024

Columbus Estates injury rate improved

Columbus Estates's TCR fell 5.2 from 5.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 14.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.2 · 2018=9.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=14.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Bakersfield, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 128% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #102/635
  • PHOTO Amavida
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amavida (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Columbus Estates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Columbus Estates averages 4.9 TCR (128% of the Retirement homes without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Columbus Estates TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2018=9 · 2019=0 · 2020=14.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Columbus Estates falls in its industry

6,510 Retirement homes without nursi establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 635 Retirement homes without nursi employers in California.

Columbus Estates (34 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Columbus Estates
Columbus Estates (34 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Columbus Estates has fewer employees than the Retirement homes without nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 14.7 14.7 0 3 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.0 0.0 2 0 0
2017 5.2 5.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Bakersfield

6,510 Retirement homes without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 818 employers in Bakersfield, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amavida 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63127 SUNRISE OF SMITHTOWN 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Dublin 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Copeland 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ardent Mills Yuba City 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Filice Farms, L.P. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alexander Ranch, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MFarms 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Bakersfield 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-04 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFL1 4,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Esparza Enterprises, Inc 3,267 FTE
NAT-TCR CHNJ Hospitality LLC 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Stainless Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR County Waste LLC 3 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Arbor Terrace Mountainside 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Guc Gunnison County Airport 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henderson Bakery Feeds 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reagent Chemical - Stanton 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linkville Roofing and Siding Inc 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.