Athletic goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing · Ohio

Columbus Foam Products

Westerville, OH · ~63 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Columbus Foam Products runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Athletic goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Columbus Foam Products: 2.4 TCR = 72% of Athletic goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Columbus Foam Products safety composite

Columbus Foam Products scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Columbus Foam Products: 1.7 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Columbus Foam Products's TCR rose 2.0 from 1.7 in 2018 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339920 · Westerville, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/10
  • PHOTO Ball Plant III
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ball Plant III (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Columbus Foam Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Columbus Foam Products averages 2.4 TCR (72% of the Athletic goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Columbus Foam Products TCR series: 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=3 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Columbus Foam Products falls in its industry

197 Athletic goods (except ammunit establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 10 Athletic goods (except ammunit employers in Ohio.

Columbus Foam Products (63 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Columbus Foam Products
Columbus Foam Products (63 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Columbus Foam Products has fewer employees than the Athletic goods (except ammunition, cloth median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 0.0 2 0 0
2023 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339920 · OH · Westerville

197 Athletic goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 141 employers in Westerville, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ball Plant III 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kollege Town Sports 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BSN Sports 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hoyt Archery 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cleveland 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nicholson Builders 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buckeye Pipeline Construction, Inc 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE NORTHSTAR ASPHALT, INC. 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Carmel St. Ann's Hospital 1,966 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westerville - 360 Westar Boulevard 1,505 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mid-City Electric 457 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA Svc ERS 391 FTE
NAT-TCR Bergelectric Corp. TX 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR DMLS 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cut Bank 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Charleston Division 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE US Mechanical, LLC - Nevada Office 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial Printers, Inc. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clay County Fair Association, Inc 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dawn Food Products - Louisville Distribution 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.