Chain hoists manufacturing · North Carolina

Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations

Wadesboro, NC · ~159 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Chain hoists manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations: 1.9 TCR = 59% of Chain hoists manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations safety composite

Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2020

Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations injury rate improved

Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.3 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=1.1 · 2020=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333923 · Wadesboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Colombus McKinnon Co…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Colombus McKinnon Corporation- Virginia Hoist (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the Chain hoists manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=1.1 · 2020=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations falls in its industry

157 Chain hoists manufacturing establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Chain hoists manufacturing employers in North Carolina.

Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations (159 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations
Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations (159 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Columbus McKinnon Wadesboro Operations has more employees than the Chain hoists manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.9 0.0 3 0 0
2018 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2017 2.5 0.6 4 0 0
2016 2.3 1.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333923 · NC · Wadesboro

157 Chain hoists manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 26 employers in Wadesboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Colombus McKinnon Corporation- Virginia Hoist 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crane Equipment & Service of Illinois, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caplingers Crane & Equipment 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Crane & Equipment Corporation Plant 2 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NHM Constructors, Inc. 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pitt Electric ORI, LLC 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lovelady Plant 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE IPEX USA LLC 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1127 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wade Manufacturing Company: Wadesboro Plant 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus McKinnon - Wadesboro 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lisk Trucking Inc 157 FTE
NAT-TCR Gemstone Foods Plant 1 - 02 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Apw Knox Seeman Warehouse, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Gaco-Wi (Bp) 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6396-Sprenger Health Care of Massillon 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mt. St. Vincent Care Center 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE SubCom LLC. 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manzanita Monterey 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michels Power-Neenah, WI 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.