Diapers, disposable, made from purchased paper or textile fiber · Mississippi

Columbus Modified Fiber

Columbus, MS · ~115 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Columbus Modified Fiber runs at 9% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Diapers, disposable, made from purchased paper or textile fiber workplace, earning a grade A.

Columbus Modified Fiber: 0.3 TCR = 9% of Diapers, disposable, made from purchased paper or textile fiber BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Columbus Modified Fiber safety composite

Columbus Modified Fiber scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Columbus Modified Fiber held a steady TCR band

Columbus Modified Fiber's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=1.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322291 · Columbus, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 9% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/5
  • PHOTO Waterford, NY
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Waterford, NY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Columbus Modified Fiber in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Columbus Modified Fiber averages 0.3 TCR (9% of the Diapers, disposable, made from purchased paper or textile fiber BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Columbus Modified Fiber TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.5 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Columbus Modified Fiber falls in its industry

113 Diapers, disposable, made from establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Diapers, disposable, made from employers in Mississippi.

Columbus Modified Fiber (115 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Columbus Modified Fiber
Columbus Modified Fiber (115 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Columbus Modified Fiber has fewer employees than the Diapers, disposable, made from purchased median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.5 0.0 1 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322291 · MS · Columbus

113 Diapers, disposable, made from purchased paper or textile fiber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 104 employers in Columbus, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Waterford, NY 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Quality Hygienic, Inc. 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Procter & Gamble Paper Products Co. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kimberly Clark Corporation Paris 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Solar Group, Inc. 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clinton 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southaven - 8735 Hamilton Rd. 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6223-804 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Columbus 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - FR Columbus 753 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paccar Engine Company 627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bracken Construction Company, Inc. 376 FTE
NAT-TCR Hulcher Services Inc - Corporate Office 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Electric Power Research Institute Knoxville 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR UCC South Charleston Facility 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pixelle-Fremont 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gold Crown Nursery, LLC 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynex Technologies, Inc. 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyundai Steel (Alabama) 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marian Manor HealthCare Center 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.