Distribution of electric power · Ohio

Columbus SE Service Center

Columbus, OH · ~44 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Columbus SE Service Center runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Columbus SE Service Center: 2.5 TCR = 207% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Columbus SE Service Center safety composite

Columbus SE Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2016→2019

Columbus SE Service Center injury rate improved

Columbus SE Service Center's TCR fell 7.7 from 7.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.7 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Columbus, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.5 · 207% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #87/120
  • PHOTO WBASC Wilkes-Barre S…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WBASC Wilkes-Barre Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Columbus SE Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Columbus SE Service Center averages 2.5 TCR (207% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Columbus SE Service Center TCR series: 2016=7.7 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Columbus SE Service Center falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 120 Distribution of electric power employers in Ohio.

Columbus SE Service Center (44 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Columbus SE Service Center
Columbus SE Service Center (44 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Columbus SE Service Center has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 7.7 5.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · OH · Columbus

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WBASC Wilkes-Barre Service Center 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Black Warrior Electric Membership Corporation 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jefferson District - Jackson EMC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bluefield WV Service Center 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.T.S.S. Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Day Farms - Croton 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Licking Rural Electricfication 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Union Rural Electric Cooperative 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Bluefield WV Service Center 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Crestwood Crude Transportation LLC - Watford City 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Meriden BOE 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TreeHouse Foods, Dothan 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Independence Village of Peoria 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE construction 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Long Beach - Resort 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Crest - Resort - Redmond 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.