Employer · Tennessee

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA

Chattanooga, TN · ~24 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical industry workplace, earning a grade C.

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA: 2.1 TCR = 102% of industry BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA safety composite

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2018→2019

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA injury rate improved

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.3 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Chattanooga, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.1 · 102% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/67
  • PHOTO Entech Sales & Servi…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Entech Sales & Service (Northlake) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA averages 2.1 TCR (102% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA TCR series: 2018=4.3 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA falls in its industry

2,560 industry establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 67 industry employers in Tennessee.

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA (24 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA
Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA (24 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-TN/MS District : SVC-Chattanooga TN-USA has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.3 4.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TN · Chattanooga

2,560 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Entech Sales & Service (Northlake) 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foley, Incorporated 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springfield-11 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mundy Support Services LLC #38001 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE RIVERSIDE FUQUA FARMS LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod USA - Nashville Sod Farm 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Warren-Viola Utility District 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE JOB 268BG Rutherford County 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR 224 - Crestwood-IL 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gosnold, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas Fort Worth Int. Airport 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 1205 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Livonia MI-USA 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE DG Farms 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE SAO 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilmington DE 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.