Annealing metals and metal products for the trade · Michigan

Commercial Steel Treating Corporation

Madison Heights, MI · ~67 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Commercial Steel Treating Corporation runs at 429% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Annealing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Commercial Steel Treating Corporation: 14.2 TCR = 429% of Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Commercial Steel Treating Corporation safety composite

Commercial Steel Treating Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Commercial Steel Treating Corporation: 5.2 → 23.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 23.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Commercial Steel Treating Corporation's TCR rose 17.9 from 5.2 in 2016 to 23.1 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Madison Heights, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.2 · 429% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/43
  • PHOTO Bodycote Winchester
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bodycote Winchester (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Commercial Steel Treating Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Commercial Steel Treating Corporation averages 14.2 TCR (429% of the Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Commercial Steel Treating Corporation TCR series: 2016=5.2 · 2023=23.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Commercial Steel Treating Corporation falls in its industry

248 Annealing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 43 Annealing metals and metal pro employers in Michigan.

Commercial Steel Treating Corporation (67 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Commercial Steel Treating Corporation
Commercial Steel Treating Corporation (67 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Commercial Steel Treating Corporation has more employees than the Annealing metals and metal products for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 23.1 0.0 6 1 0
2016 5.2 2.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · MI · Madison Heights

248 Annealing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 107 employers in Madison Heights, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bodycote Winchester 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bodycote Thermal Processing Inc. - Covington 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zion Industries Hildebran Plant 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Colson Group LLC 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cadillac SC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE CS Erickson 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Contracting LLC 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leading Edge - Wyoming 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR MADISON HEIGHTS (MIMAD) 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIMAD - MADISON HEIGHTS 749 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET183 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDET183 ASCENSION MACOMB-OAKLAND HOSP - MADISON HEIGHTS 509 FTE
NAT-TCR OrePac Building Products - Boise 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 0583 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 202 Las Vegas 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Magic City Enterprises, Inc. 14.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Times Supermarket Waipahu 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE H&S Plumbing 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charleston Corporation 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raley's 901- Far West 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.