Trucking, general freight, local · Indiana

Commercial Works Indianapolis

Indianapolis, IN · ~36 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Commercial Works Indianapolis runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Trucking, general freight, local workplace, earning a grade F.

Commercial Works Indianapolis: 10.6 TCR = 236% of Trucking, general freight, local BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Commercial Works Indianapolis safety composite

Commercial Works Indianapolis scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2022

Commercial Works Indianapolis injury rate improved

Commercial Works Indianapolis's TCR fell 1.4 from 9.2 in 2016 to 7.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 75.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.2 · 2018=21.1 · 2019=4.5 · 2021=75.7 · 2022=7.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 236% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #81/85
  • PHOTO Mondelez Global - Na…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mondelez Global - Nashville DSD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Commercial Works Indianapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Commercial Works Indianapolis averages 10.6 TCR (236% of the Trucking, general freight, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Commercial Works Indianapolis TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2018=21.1 · 2019=4.5 · 2021=75.7 · 2022=7.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Commercial Works Indianapolis falls in its industry

2,784 Trucking, general freight, loc establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 85 Trucking, general freight, loc employers in Indiana.

Commercial Works Indianapolis (36 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Commercial Works Indianapolis
Commercial Works Indianapolis (36 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Commercial Works Indianapolis has fewer employees than the Trucking, general freight, local median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.7 7.7 2 0 0
2021 75.7 75.7 3 0 0
2019 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2018 21.1 21.1 9 0 0
2016 9.2 9.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · IN · Indianapolis

2,784 Trucking, general freight, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mondelez Global - Nashville DSD 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MWF Trucking 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nicholas Trucking Company, Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FORT MYERS (FLFMS) 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indy, Churchman Pack 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Natural Beauty Growers, LLC - Richmond IN 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hidden View Dairy, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elkhart Office and Service Building 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-40431) 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1110 University Place 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4598-Rtc St. Peters 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD 991- ELC Pipestone 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oak Elementary School 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE TWGW, Inc. / Wilson's NAPA 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZSPE 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Havenwood of Richfield 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.