Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Maryland

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville

Cockesyville, MD · ~23 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville: 4.7 TCR = 123% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville safety composite

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville: 0.0 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 51.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.02× in 2023

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville's TCR rose 4.8 from 0.0 in 2019 to 4.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 51.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Cockesyville, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 123% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #25/79
  • PHOTO SPRING ARBOR OF CROF…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SPRING ARBOR OF CROFTON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville averages 4.7 TCR (123% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=8.9 · 2021=51.9 · 2022=5 · 2023=4.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 79 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maryland.

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville (23 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville
Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville (23 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Commonwealth Senior Living at Cockeysville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2022 5.0 5.0 0 1 0
2021 51.9 46.1 1 8 0
2020 8.9 8.9 1 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MD · Cockesyville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SPRING ARBOR OF CROFTON 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Millbrae Assisted Living LLC 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Waterford at Creekside 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gardens of Scottsdale 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Centrica Business Solutions - Solar 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forestville Office 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Transportation Building 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairmont (Cheval Condominium) 23 FTE
NAT-TCR Food City 065 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5147 Manchester, CT 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR JAE Oregon 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Armacell LLC 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Club BOS 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Fire & Water Repair 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roosevelt Warm Springs 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Locally Owned Radio, LLC. 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.