assisted living community · Virginia

Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall

Norfolk, VA · ~55 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall runs at 549% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical assisted living community workplace, earning a grade F.

Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall: 20.9 TCR = 549% of assisted living community BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall safety composite

Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall: 14.1 → 22.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 75.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2024

Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall's TCR rose 8.2 from 14.1 in 2020 to 22.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 75.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Norfolk, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.9 · 549% of ind

  • DART 22.3 DART
  • RANK #193/199
  • PHOTO KRE-BSL HUSKY BUCKLA…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KRE-BSL HUSKY BUCKLAND OPERATION LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall averages 20.9 TCR (549% of the assisted living community BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall TCR series: 2020=14.1 · 2021=75.9 · 2022=17.9 · 2023=29.2 · 2024=22.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall falls in its industry

6,510 assisted living community establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #193 safest of 199 assisted living community employers in Virginia.

Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall (55 employees, TCR 20.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall
Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall (55 employees, TCR 20.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Commonwealth Senior Living at Leigh Hall has more employees than the assisted living community median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 22.3 22.3 10 1 0
2023 29.2 27.4 2 14 0
2022 17.9 17.9 2 7 0
2021 75.9 75.9 1 35 0
2020 14.1 14.1 2 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Norfolk

6,510 assisted living community employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 473 employers in Norfolk, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY BUCKLAND OPERATION LLC 20.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harbor Senior Management 20.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Place of Kings Mountain 20.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auberge at Plano 20.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hendrix 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gregory Pallet & Lumber Roanoke 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trump Vineyard Estates LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE SERVPRO of Chesapeake 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sentara Norfolk General Hospital 4,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital of The Kings Dau 3,707 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Atlantic Group dba DZ Atlantic 3,248 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norfolk State University 2,981 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0112 Monrovia 20.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bos-Ground Ops 20.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 165100-Midlothian Po 20.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Thigpen Trucking,INC 20.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Henry Office 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raleigh Lanehart Electric Co., Inc 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lanehart Electrical Contracotrs, LLC 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Casler Masonry, Inc. 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.