Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire · North Carolina

CommScope Claremont Facility

Claremont, NC · ~705 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CommScope Claremont Facility runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire workplace, earning a grade B.

CommScope Claremont Facility: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CommScope Claremont Facility safety composite

CommScope Claremont Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CommScope Claremont Facility: 1.6 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.68× in 2017

CommScope Claremont Facility's TCR rose 1.0 from 1.6 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335929 · Claremont, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #10/18
  • PHOTO Harbour Industries, …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~705 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harbour Industries, LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

CommScope Claremont Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CommScope Claremont Facility averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CommScope Claremont Facility TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where CommScope Claremont Facility falls in its industry

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 18 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, employers in North Carolina.

CommScope Claremont Facility (705 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CommScope Claremont Facility
CommScope Claremont Facility (705 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3

CommScope Claremont Facility has more employees than the Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.6 1.4 20 0 0
2016 1.6 1.1 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335929 · NC · Claremont

144 Cable, nonferrous, insulated, or armored, made from purchased nonferrous wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 28 employers in Claremont, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harbour Industries, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Draka Elevator Products, Inc. Walnut 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trans Cable International 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TE Wire & Cable, LLC 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cary Manufacturing Facility 705 FTE
STATE-SIZE GBO-ODFL 705 FTE
STATE-SIZE Annapolis DC 705 FTE
STATE-SIZE ADUSA Dist DC 04 Dunn NC 703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Claremont Plant 858 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hickory DC & HUB / Sutter East - Claremont 751 FTE
CITY-NEAR Claremont 672 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cargo Transporters, Inc. 589 FTE
NAT-TCR Ursa Logistics - Indianapolis 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR WVCO Equip Mfg 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR KOCH Mechanical Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sonoma Cove 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE IL-Elwood-Transloading 705 FTE
NAT-SIZE USS Fairfield Works - Tubular 705 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : STL6 705 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plainsboro 705 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.