Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · New York

Community and Day Services

Depew, NY · ~43 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community and Day Services runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Community and Day Services: 3.9 TCR = 103% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community and Day Services safety composite

Community and Day Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2020

Community and Day Services injury rate improved

Community and Day Services's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2019=8.5 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Depew, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 103% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #57/158
  • PHOTO CCSI-Joliet
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CCSI-Joliet (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Community and Day Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community and Day Services averages 3.9 TCR (103% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Community and Day Services TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2019=8.5 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Community and Day Services falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 158 Activity centers for disabled employers in New York.

Community and Day Services (43 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Community and Day Services
Community and Day Services (43 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Community and Day Services has fewer employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.5 8.5 2 0 0
2016 3.3 3.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · NY · Depew

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 61 employers in Depew, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CCSI-Joliet 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2356 North Forest Road 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westlake (N300) 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DPH Central Office 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phillips Family Farm, Inc. 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora Ridge Dairy, LLC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allenwaite Farms, Inc. 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG 3 City Center 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCB Piezotronics 617 FTE
CITY-NEAR Losson Road 526 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Losson Road 087 521 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Dick Road 080 457 FTE
NAT-TCR Quilcene, WA Hatchery 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Circleville Family Practice 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR American Wilcon Plastisc, Inc. A Division of Airvent, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 177 Cathedral City 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Summit Place of Daniel Island 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wright-Patterson AFB 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Plains Ord LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3890 Parts Channel Pico Rivera 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.