Community action service agencies · Arizona

Community Foundation for Southern Arizona

Tucson, AZ · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community Foundation for Southern Arizona runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Community action service agencies workplace, earning a grade D.

Community Foundation for Southern Arizona: 5.5 TCR = 146% of Community action service agencies BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community Foundation for Southern Arizona safety composite

Community Foundation for Southern Arizona scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Community Foundation for Southern Arizona: 5.2 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Community Foundation for Southern Arizona's TCR rose 0.5 from 5.2 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 146% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/16
  • PHOTO MSC Federal Way
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MSC Federal Way (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Community Foundation for Southern Arizona in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community Foundation for Southern Arizona averages 5.5 TCR (146% of the Community action service agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Community Foundation for Southern Arizona TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=5.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Community Foundation for Southern Arizona falls in its industry

990 Community action service agenc establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 16 Community action service agenc employers in Arizona.

Community Foundation for Southern Arizona (20 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Community Foundation for Southern Arizona
Community Foundation for Southern Arizona (20 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Community Foundation for Southern Arizona has fewer employees than the Community action service agencies median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.7 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 5.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · AZ · Tucson

990 Community action service agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MSC Federal Way 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tuscaloosa Head Start Center 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR HATEDU-CARES-6752 HWY 98 W 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ReEntry House Crisis 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE A. Oseguera Company 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Animal Nutrition Systems - ANS12 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Animal Nutrition Systems (Plant) - ANSP581 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tucson Corporate Office 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Kosciusko County 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 376 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 347 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Preferred Laundry Services, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Process Displays, LLC - Solid 4 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Christiana Store 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nashville TN Panel 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Circle City Cabinets 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.