Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Community Housing & Service Corporation

Saint Louis Park, MN · ~38 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community Housing & Service Corporation runs at 398% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Community Housing & Service Corporation: 15.1 TCR = 398% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community Housing & Service Corporation safety composite

Community Housing & Service Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 27.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Community Housing & Service Corporation: 0.0 → 27.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 27.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.8× in 2020

Community Housing & Service Corporation's TCR rose 27.1 from 0.0 in 2018 to 27.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Saint Louis Park, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.1 · 398% of ind

  • DART 27.1 DART
  • RANK #189/226
  • PHOTO The Blake at Flowood
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Blake at Flowood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Community Housing & Service Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community Housing & Service Corporation averages 15.1 TCR (398% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Community Housing & Service Corporation TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=18.2 · 2020=27.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Community Housing & Service Corporation falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #189 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Community Housing & Service Corporation (38 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Community Housing & Service Corporation
Community Housing & Service Corporation (38 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Community Housing & Service Corporation has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 27.1 27.1 0 8 0
2019 18.2 6.1 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Saint Louis Park

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 33 employers in Saint Louis Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Blake at Flowood 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dorian Place 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Peoria 1 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trinity Springs 15.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pine Tree Orchard 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE LB Pork Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foley Hatchery 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2528-Glyndon, MN (Monsanto Co.) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Louis Park Methodist Hosp 2,943 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Louis Park 3800 Bldg 769 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Louis Pk Specialty Ctr 6500 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Louis Pk Specialty Ctr 3931 441 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Tulare 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR WCA Stockton 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Njpns - Pennsauken 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR LIT - Ground Ops 15.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE South Georgia District - Harvey & Taylor Foster 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mendota Agri Products 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morningside of Jackson 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sixt Rent A Car - Denver International Airport 43997 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.