Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Pennsylvania

Community Living Care

Greensburg, PA · ~238 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community Living Care runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Community Living Care: 9.3 TCR = 244% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community Living Care safety composite

Community Living Care scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 38% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.5

2016→2023

Community Living Care injury rate improved

Community Living Care's TCR fell 9.5 from 15.3 in 2016 to 5.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.3 · 2019=15.8 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Greensburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 244% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #90/121
  • PHOTO The Arc Adult Traini…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 122 inj
  • SIZE ~238 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Arc Adult Training Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Community Living Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community Living Care averages 9.3 TCR (244% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Community Living Care TCR series: 2016=15.3 · 2019=15.8 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=6 · 2023=5.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Community Living Care falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 121 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Pennsylvania.

Community Living Care (238 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Community Living Care
Community Living Care (238 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Community Living Care has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.8 3.9 9 0 0
2022 6.0 5.3 9 0 1
2021 5.5 3.9 7 0 0
2020 7.2 5.4 12 0 0
2019 15.8 3.8 45 1 0
2016 15.3 3.8 40 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · PA · Greensburg

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 129 employers in Greensburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Arc Adult Training Services 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 42-018114074-8 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woodmead 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 62nd Court 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 190634 Westmoreland Generating Station 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE houck specialty contractors 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haller Enterprises - Lititz 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trinity Glass - Pennsylvania 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westmoreland Hospital 1,943 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westmoreland Regional Hospital 1,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Penn Power 695 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scott Electric 663 FTE
NAT-TCR Baker's Quality Pizza Crusts, Inc 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Arlington Plating Company 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Park Village HC NP LLC 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Der-Inc-Dermott Juvenile Facility 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE CMH Manufacturing West Inc. 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waseca Mn 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stanley Infrastructure 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE SEAM Group LLC 238 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.