Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Maryland

Community Living, Inc.

Frederick, MD · ~190 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community Living, Inc. runs at 315% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Community Living, Inc.: 12.0 TCR = 315% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community Living, Inc. safety composite

Community Living, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2020→2024

Community Living, Inc. injury rate improved

Community Living, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.0 from 10.4 in 2020 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 31.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=10.4 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=31.7 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Frederick, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.0 · 315% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #18/18
  • PHOTO SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINI…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~190 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA TRAINING CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Community Living, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community Living, Inc. averages 12.0 TCR (315% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Community Living, Inc. TCR series: 2020=10.4 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=31.7 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Community Living, Inc. falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 18 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Maryland.

Community Living, Inc. (190 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Community Living, Inc.
Community Living, Inc. (190 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Community Living, Inc. has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.3 9 0 0
2023 8.9 5.1 9 5 0
2022 31.7 27.4 9 50 0
2021 6.5 5.7 9 16 0
2020 10.4 10.4 5 17 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MD · Frederick

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 267 employers in Frederick, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA TRAINING CENTER 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springbrook NY Inc - Sunshine 550 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ASPIRE - BOISE ID 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reed 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Closetmaid - Grantsville 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1004 - Bowie 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 6651 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2248-60019 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR MD-03 4,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing Center 775 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific Frederick, MD (BID - Executive Way) 568 FTE
NAT-TCR RidgeLine Direct Inc. 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Michigan Solar Solutions West 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fusion Babbitting Company, Inc 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Cannon Falls 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 0019 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0459 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0461 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0509 190 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.