Skilled nursing facilities · Indiana

Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Indianapolis, IN · ~100 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 35% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 2.3 TCR = 35% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 1.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 4.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2021

Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 2.4 from 1.0 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.3 · 35% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #54/640
  • PHOTO Juliette Fowler Comm…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Juliette Fowler Communities (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 2.3 TCR (35% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=3.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 640 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Indiana.

Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (100 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (100 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2020 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2019 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2017 4.5 3.4 4 0 0
2016 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · IN · Indianapolis

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Juliette Fowler Communities 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caraday of Mesquite 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JO ELLEN SMITH LIVING CENTER 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lawrenceville Health & Rehabilitation 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Belstra Group Farms 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merritt Contracting 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Geiger Excavating Inc. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kens Foods Lebanon 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR American Furniture Rental-Orlando 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Buffalo, NY 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR S04055 - WM of Junction City 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR GroundsPRO LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nekoosa Coated Products 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE A. F. Wendling Foodservice 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clean Harbors Environmental Services Inc 41SB 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.