Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · Maryland

Community Options Fredrick MD

Frederick, MD · ~39 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community Options Fredrick MD runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Community Options Fredrick MD: 5.0 TCR = 132% of Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community Options Fredrick MD safety composite

Community Options Fredrick MD scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Community Options Fredrick MD: 2.8 → 7.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2024

Community Options Fredrick MD's TCR rose 4.5 from 2.8 in 2023 to 7.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Frederick, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 132% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #9/14
  • PHOTO Community Hab
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Community Hab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Community Options Fredrick MD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community Options Fredrick MD averages 5.0 TCR (132% of the Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Community Options Fredrick MD TCR series: 2023=2.8 · 2024=7.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Community Options Fredrick MD falls in its industry

1,320 Residential Intellectual and D establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 14 Residential Intellectual and D employers in Maryland.

Community Options Fredrick MD (39 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Community Options Fredrick MD
Community Options Fredrick MD (39 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Community Options Fredrick MD has fewer employees than the Residential Intellectual and Development median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.2 4.8 3 0 0
2023 2.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MD · Frederick

1,320 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 267 employers in Frederick, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Community Hab 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TheKey - CA, Pasadena (1055 E. Colorado Blvd.) 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trusted Senior Care, LLC 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO THE PAM STEPHENS CENTER 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Maryland Division Office 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHRG MD-BAL 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Point Builders of Maryland 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clevenger Interiors, LLC. 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR MD-03 4,250 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing Center 775 FTE
CITY-NEAR AstraZeneca Frederick Manufacturing 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thermo Fisher Scientific Frederick, MD (BID - Executive Way) 568 FTE
NAT-TCR Spanish Trail Lumber 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kyntp - Htr National Turnpike 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EB Meadow Woods 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Metrex Corporation 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nachi Tool America Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-711 THOMLIN MILL ROAD 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kscol - Colby 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Physical Plant 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.