Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · Pennsylvania

Community Options Pittsburgh PA

Pittsburgh, PA · ~169 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community Options Pittsburgh PA runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Community Options Pittsburgh PA: 5.3 TCR = 138% of Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community Options Pittsburgh PA safety composite

Community Options Pittsburgh PA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Community Options Pittsburgh PA: 4.7 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.81× in 2024

Community Options Pittsburgh PA's TCR rose 1.1 from 4.7 in 2023 to 5.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 138% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #79/145
  • PHOTO VES - Dimensions
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~169 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VES - Dimensions (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Community Options Pittsburgh PA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community Options Pittsburgh PA averages 5.3 TCR (138% of the Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Community Options Pittsburgh PA TCR series: 2023=4.7 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Community Options Pittsburgh PA falls in its industry

1,320 Residential Intellectual and D establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 145 Residential Intellectual and D employers in Pennsylvania.

Community Options Pittsburgh PA (169 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Community Options Pittsburgh PA
Community Options Pittsburgh PA (169 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Community Options Pittsburgh PA has more employees than the Residential Intellectual and Development median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 4.2 10 1 0
2023 4.7 0.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · PA · Pittsburgh

1,320 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VES - Dimensions 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PACE Lynchburg 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adaptive Nursing and Healthcare Services, INC -Lafayette 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CCSI-Quincy 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eighty-Four, PA 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Side Hammer Electric 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Safway Services, LLC - Philadelphia 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lear Guilford - Pine Grove 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR JBS Plainwell INC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Algoo - Goodwater Center 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tropicana Atlantic City 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Zero Motorcycles inc. 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Advanced Molding Technologies 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Idmri - Meridian Center 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caiwd - Inglewood 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alope - Opelika 169 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.