General public administration · Minnesota

Community Planning & Economic Development

Name: Community Planning & Economic Development Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Minneapolis, MN · ~289 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.8
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community Planning & Economic Development runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General public administration workplace, earning a grade A.

Community Planning & Economic Development: 0.8 TCR = 24% of General public administration BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community Planning & Economic Development safety composite

Community Planning & Economic Development scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers
DART rate: C 0.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Community Planning & Economic Development held a steady TCR band

Community Planning & Economic Development's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.8 in 2017 to 0.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.8 · 2018=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

DART 0.2 DART
RANK #27/275
PHOTO Kentucky Personnel C…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~289 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kentucky Personnel Cabinet (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.8
Kentucky Perso

0.8
SA-St Paul Cen

0.8
County of York

0.8
Sanitation

0.8

What this shows Community Planning & Economic Development averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the General public administration BLS benchmark).

Community Planning & Economic Development TCR series: 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Community Planning & Economic Development falls in its industry

1,496 General public administration establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 275 General public administration employers in Minnesota.

Community Planning & Economic Development (289 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Community Planning & Economic Development has more employees than the General public administration median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	0.7	0.2	3	0	0
2017	0.8	0.8	2	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · MN · Minneapolis

1,496 General public administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Kentucky Personnel Cabinet	FRANKFORT, KY	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	SA-St Paul Central Office	ST. PAUL, MN	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	County of York Emergency Communications	YORKTOWN, VA	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Sanitation	WALLA WALLA, WA	0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	0005 - Bloomington	BLOOMINGTON	289 FTE
STATE-SIZE	9998 Coborn's Support Center	ST. CLOUD	289 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Stillwater Medical Clinic	STILLWATER	289 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Public Works	DULUTH	289 FTE
CITY-NEAR	University of Minnesota Twin Cities	Minneapolis	22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR	MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER	Minneapolis	12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR	0501 - City Center	Minneapolis	8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Hennepin County Medical Center	Minneapolis	7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR	Fairfax Office (100141)	Fairfax, VA	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Saint Rose NOL	Saint Rose, LA	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	C&S Worldwide Holdings Inc.	Syracuse, NY	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Nursing & Therapy Services of Colorado, Inc.	Colorado Springs, CO	0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Developmental Services Division	Scranton, PA	289 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Thermo Fisher Scientific	Kalamazoo, MI	289 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Lake Erie Correctional Inst	Conneaut, OH	289 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Main Office	Williamsport, PA	289 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.