Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Compass on the Bay

South Boston, MA · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Compass on the Bay runs at 358% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Compass on the Bay: 13.6 TCR = 358% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Compass on the Bay safety composite

Compass on the Bay scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Compass on the Bay: 0.0 → 7.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 52.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2024

Compass on the Bay's TCR rose 7.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 7.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 52.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · South Boston, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.6 · 358% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #174/210
  • PHOTO Eden Heights of Eden
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eden Heights of Eden (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Compass on the Bay in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Compass on the Bay averages 13.6 TCR (358% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Compass on the Bay TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=8.4 · 2018=15.3 · 2019=15.7 · 2020=44 · 2021=13.2 · 2022=52.1 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=7.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Compass on the Bay falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #174 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Compass on the Bay (47 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Compass on the Bay
Compass on the Bay (47 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Compass on the Bay has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.2 7.2 3 0 0
2023 5.1 5.1 1 1 0
2022 52.1 52.1 1 16 0
2021 13.2 13.2 2 1 0
2020 44.0 44.0 1 18 0
2019 15.7 15.7 5 0 0
2018 15.3 15.3 5 0 0
2017 8.4 5.6 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · South Boston

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 22 employers in South Boston, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eden Heights of Eden 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Wood Ranch 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst of Edwardsville 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bentley Commons at Paragon Village 13.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rockwell Roofing, Inc 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Valley Photovoltaics Cooperative, Inc 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE MONSON-MA23 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE 855-NiSource-Westborough MA 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillette Company South Boston Plant 1,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR McCourt Construction Company 248 FTE
CITY-NEAR 426 E. 1St St. 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR MA - South Boston, 426 E 1st St 155 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0745 Chapel Hill 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1177 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Willow Creek Veterinary Center 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross Manor 13.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Haynes Plumbing 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ripon Pickle Co., Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kenwood Collection #757 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mavid Construction Services 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.