Hospice care services, in home · New Jersey

Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River

Toms River, NJ · ~49 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
5.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hospice care services, in home workplace, earning a grade C.

Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River: 4.7 TCR = 90% of Hospice care services, in home BLS 5.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River safety composite

Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River: 0.0 → 9.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2018

Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River's TCR rose 9.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 9.4 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621610 · Toms River, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.7 · 90% of ind

  • DART 9.4 DART
  • RANK #76/196
  • PHOTO 1149 - ALT
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1149 - ALT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River averages 4.7 TCR (90% of the Hospice care services, in home BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=9.4 · BLS 5.2

Where Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River falls in its industry

3,635 Hospice care services, in home establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #76 safest of 196 Hospice care services, in home employers in New Jersey.

Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River (49 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River
Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River (49 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Compassionate Care Hospice of Toms River has fewer employees than the Hospice care services, in home median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 9.4 9.4 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621610 · NJ · Toms River

3,635 Hospice care services, in home employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 115 employers in Toms River, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1149 - ALT 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR American CM Hospice Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Compassus Huntsville 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHI HEALTH AT HOME - LINCOLN 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE NJR Clean Energy Ventures Corp 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Water Operations and Maintenance, LLC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs - NORTH HUDSON SEWERAGE AUTHORITY - OMI 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE IPS - Integrated Project Services, LLC - Cherry Hill 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Medical Center 2,848 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shoprite of Fischer Bay 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Jersey Behavioral Health 427 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthSouth Rehabilitation Hospital Of Toms River 391 FTE
NAT-TCR Fort Transfer - St. Gabriel 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Store #39 (Lincoln, NE (South)) 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trousdale Turner Correctional 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Champlain Transportation Co. 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Compassionate Care Hospice of Columbia 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE 609 Center Ave 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1144 Route 109 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Justin Terminal 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.