Polyester fibers and filaments manufacturing · North Carolina

Complex 46 - Extrusion

Name: Complex 46 - Extrusion Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Mcadenville, NC · ~104 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · September 26, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 3.4
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Complex 46 - Extrusion runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Polyester fibers and filaments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Complex 46 - Extrusion: 3.4 TCR = 104% of Polyester fibers and filaments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Complex 46 - Extrusion safety composite

Complex 46 - Extrusion scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 3.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers
DART rate: A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2019

Complex 46 - Extrusion injury rate improved

Complex 46 - Extrusion's TCR fell 2.0 from 5.3 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.3 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325220 · Mcadenville, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 104% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #3/6
PHOTO Plant 8S
BOOK 4y book
INJ 13 inj
SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plant 8S (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Euclid LaFayet

3.6
Plant 8S

3.5
This site

3.4
Cavetown

3.3
Plant 65

3.3

What this shows Complex 46 - Extrusion averages 3.4 TCR (104% of the Polyester fibers and filaments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Complex 46 - Extrusion TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Complex 46 - Extrusion falls in its industry

68 Polyester fibers and filaments establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Polyester fibers and filaments employers in North Carolina.

Complex 46 - Extrusion (104 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 167 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Complex 46 - Extrusion has fewer employees than the Polyester fibers and filaments manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2019	3.2	0.0	1	2
2018	2.6	1.8	3	0
2017	2.6	0.0	3	0
2016	5.3	4.4	6	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325220 · NC · Mcadenville

68 Polyester fibers and filaments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 10 employers in Mcadenville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Plant 8S	COLUMBIA, SC	3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cavetown	CAVETOWN, MD	3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Euclid LaFayette	LAFAYETTE, GA	3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Plant 65	ANDALUSIA, AL	3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Town of Louisburg	LOUISBURG	104 FTE
STATE-SIZE	WM 3411	FAYETTEVILLE	104 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Roanoke Rapids	ROANOKE RAPIDS	104 FTE
STATE-SIZE	N. G. Purvis Farms	ROBBINS	104 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Complex 46	Mcadenville	359 FTE
CITY-NEAR	HP - High Performance	Mcadenville	292 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Complex 46 Plants 1 and 2	Mcadenville	194 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Complex 46 Plant 3	Mcadenville	104 FTE
NAT-TCR	Aperion Care Litchfield	Litchfield, IL	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	1305 Walnut Street Corp	Philadelphia, PA	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Black Tooth Brewing Company LLC	Sheridan, WY	3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	New River Energetics	Radford, VA	3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Lake Parker	Lakeland, FL	104 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Springwood Center	Sarasota, FL	104 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Cuero Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	Cuero, TX	104 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Cresskill, NJ	Cresskill, NJ	104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.