Carpentry, framing · Massachusetts

Component Assembly Systems Boston MA.

Medford, MA · ~122 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Component Assembly Systems Boston MA. runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Carpentry, framing workplace, earning a grade D.

Component Assembly Systems Boston MA.: 4.6 TCR = 164% of Carpentry, framing BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Component Assembly Systems Boston MA. safety composite

Component Assembly Systems Boston MA. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2024

Component Assembly Systems Boston MA. injury rate improved

Component Assembly Systems Boston MA.'s TCR fell 1.5 from 6.2 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.2 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238130 · Medford, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 164% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Manteca FS (SSS,SAT)
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manteca FS (SSS,SAT) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Component Assembly Systems Boston MA. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Component Assembly Systems Boston MA. averages 4.6 TCR (164% of the Carpentry, framing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Component Assembly Systems Boston MA. TCR series: 2016=6.2 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Component Assembly Systems Boston MA. falls in its industry

387 Carpentry, framing establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Carpentry, framing employers in Massachusetts.

Component Assembly Systems Boston MA. (122 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Component Assembly Systems Boston MA.
Component Assembly Systems Boston MA. (122 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Component Assembly Systems Boston MA. has more employees than the Carpentry, framing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 4.7 3 0 0
2023 2.8 2.8 5 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 5 0 0
2021 3.6 3.6 4 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 4 0 0
2019 6.1 5.3 15 0 0
2018 5.6 4.5 10 0 0
2017 3.5 2.4 3 0 0
2016 6.2 6.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238130 · MA · Medford

387 Carpentry, framing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 54 employers in Medford, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manteca FS (SSS,SAT) 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coyote Construction LLC 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hi-Tech Interiors Inc 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joseph Crown Construction and Development Inc. 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE OPERATIONS CENTER-MA38 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medford Wellington Service 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Araujo Bros Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shire: 125 Spring Street 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Melrose Wakefield Hospital 1,232 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Memorial Hospital 584 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Medford 134 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bond Brothers, Inc. 414 FTE
NAT-TCR Saint Vincent Hospital 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0281 Carson City 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Flint, Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hunter Truck - Butler 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0741 Cary 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monson Contracting - Britt 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlas Foundry Company, Inc 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midway 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.