Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing · Rhode Island

Composite Energy Technologies

Bristol, RI · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Composite Energy Technologies runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Composite Energy Technologies: 3.8 TCR = 115% of Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Composite Energy Technologies safety composite

Composite Energy Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Composite Energy Technologies: 2.2 → 5.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.39× in 2024

Composite Energy Technologies's TCR rose 3.1 from 2.2 in 2018 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Bristol, RI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 115% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #7/14
  • PHOTO Petroleum Containmen…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Petroleum Containment - Jacksonville FL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Rhode Island employers → · Look up another →

Composite Energy Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Composite Energy Technologies averages 3.8 TCR (115% of the Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Composite Energy Technologies TCR series: 2018=2.2 · 2021=7.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Composite Energy Technologies falls in its industry

2,838 Awnings, rigid plastics or fib establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Rhode Island alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 14 Awnings, rigid plastics or fib employers in Rhode Island.

Composite Energy Technologies (43 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Composite Energy Technologies
Composite Energy Technologies (43 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Composite Energy Technologies has fewer employees than the Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.7 5.1 3 0 0
2018 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · RI · Bristol

2,838 Awnings, rigid plastics or fiberglass, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,610 rated employers in Rhode Island with headcount on file · 23 employers in Bristol, RI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Petroleum Containment - Jacksonville FL 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peabody Engineering, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camco mfg., LLC #2 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenere Plastics Division 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Warren, RI 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coldmaster Temperature Control 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coldmasters Temperature Control Inc. - Cranston RI 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE ashaway line & twine 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silver Creek Manor 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR 100723 149 FTE
CITY-NEAR STOP & SHOP 100723 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tri-Mack Plastics mfg. corp. 123 FTE
NAT-TCR ELG Utica Alloys Inc., New York 1 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairfield Inn Deptford 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1342 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Robertson Heating Supply Co. of Ohio 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gottlieb Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lebanon TN Truss 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tasco Plumbing & Mechanical Services 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn Dubuque 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.