Employer · New York

Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA

Buffalo, NY · ~398 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade B.

Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA: 2.1 TCR = 63% of industry BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA safety composite

Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2017→2019

Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA injury rate improved

Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.5 in 2017 to 0.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.5 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333912 · Buffalo, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #9/10
  • PHOTO Ratermann Manufactur…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~398 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ratermann Manufacturing, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA falls in its industry

128 industry establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 10 industry employers in New York.

Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA (398 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA
Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA (398 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-Buffalo, NY-USA has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2018 2.5 1.8 10 1 0
2017 3.5 2.6 15 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333912 · NY · Buffalo

128 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 532 employers in Buffalo, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ratermann Manufacturing, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corken 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otsego 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amh 555 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Northline Utilities LLC 398 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rochdale Village, Inc. 398 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Medical Associates, PC 398 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brothers of Mercy Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buffalo General Hospital 3,556 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Hospital of Buffalo 2,379 FTE
CITY-NEAR WNY Independent Living, Inc. 1,988 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kaleida Health Oishei Childrens Hospital 1,765 FTE
NAT-TCR CW Specialty Lumber Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Mold Company, Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CA305A 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Largo Medical - Indian Rocks (formerly Suncoast) 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Whittier Rehabilitation Hospital 398 FTE
NAT-SIZE NC0017C151 398 FTE
NAT-SIZE York Road 398 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sherwood Foods-Ohio 398 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.