Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system · California

Compton Field Office

Compton, CA · ~95 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Compton Field Office runs at 949% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

Compton Field Office: 11.4 TCR = 949% of Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Compton Field Office safety composite

Compton Field Office scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Compton Field Office: 3.5 → 8.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 21.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2024

Compton Field Office's TCR rose 5.2 from 3.5 in 2017 to 8.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 21.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Compton, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 949% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #66/74
  • PHOTO Metro Biosolids Center
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Metro Biosolids Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Compton Field Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Compton Field Office averages 11.4 TCR (949% of the Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Compton Field Office TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=12.3 · 2021=19.5 · 2022=21.4 · 2023=8.3 · 2024=8.7 · BLS 1.2

Where Compton Field Office falls in its industry

400 Waste collection, treatment, a establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 74 Waste collection, treatment, a employers in California.

Compton Field Office (95 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Compton Field Office
Compton Field Office (95 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Compton Field Office has more employees than the Waste collection, treatment, and disposa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.7 5.0 5 2 0
2023 8.3 7.1 7 0 0
2022 21.4 20.2 6 12 0
2021 19.5 14.4 8 11 0
2020 12.3 11.3 4 9 0
2019 7.1 6.1 7 0 0
2018 10.3 10.3 10 0 0
2017 3.5 0.9 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · CA · Compton

400 Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Compton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Metro Biosolids Center 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ypsilanti Community Utilities Authority Maintenance 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ellison Environmental, Inc. 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CITY OF GRANITE CITY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Del Llano Farms 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Los Altos Farms, LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE TreeSource 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa View Farms 2 (Madera) 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-017 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC006 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC001 789 FTE
CITY-NEAR The People Concern - SOLAR 448 FTE
NAT-TCR BEI Hilliard Branch 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tahiti Village 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sugar Creek 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Willapa Harbor Hospital 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mobotrex Davenport 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Railroad Nursery, Inc. 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capitol Heights 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Corners 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.